In Nma/3043/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Atax, Citu-Xv, Mumbai v. Ashwin D.parikh, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3043 OF 2002ININCOME TAX APPEAL(LDG.) NO. 898 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Ashwin D. Parikh.
... Respondent.
Parag Vyas for the appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGAAND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 4th October 2005.
Routine and casual affidavit filed cannot result in
condonation of delay.
order dated 29th August, 2005 directing service to
the respondents by way of last chance.
3.In the result, motion stands rejected with
no order as to costs.
4.Appeal papers be consigned to the record.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue