Nma/3048/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. Hari Om Sharma
High Court
09 Jul 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3048/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. Hari Om Sharma
Date of order
09 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3048/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. Hari Om Sharma, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3048 OF 2011
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.844 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18, MumbaiV/s.Hari Om Sharam, Mumbai
....Appellant
....Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr.J.D. Mistri, Senior Counsel with Mr.K. Gopal and Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 9TH JULY, 2012.
P.C. :-
1.For the reasons stated in the order passed today in Notice of Motion No.3049 of 2011 in Income Tax Appeal (Lodging) No.845 of 2005, this notice of motion is also made absolute in terms of prayers (A) and (B) subject to the appellant paying the costs fixed at Rs.10,000/- to the respondent on or before 9.8.2012.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue