Nma/3055/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bindi Chemicals And Agencies Trading P. Ltd
High Court
11 Sep 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3055/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bindi Chemicals And Agencies Trading P. Ltd
Date of order
11 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/3055/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bindi Chemicals And Agencies Trading P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3055 0F 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3055 0F 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3055 0F 2005
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1286 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1286 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Bindi Chemicals & Agencies
Trading P. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with P.P.Bhosale and P.S.Sahadevan
for appellant.
Mr.Raj Darak for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH SEPTENBER, 2007.
DATED : 11TH SEPTENBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Delay is less than 200 days. Considering the
practical difficulties which the Department was facing
including referring the matters to the Law Department,
Government of India for drafting the appeal memo and
considering the affidavit in support of the notice of
Motion, in our opinion, cause shown would amount to
sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned. The Notice of
Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Office to register the appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.