Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3067/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3067/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-8, Mumbai v. M/S. West Coast Containers Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3067/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-8, Mumbai v. M/S. West Coast Containers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/3067/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-8, Mumbai v. M/S. West Coast Containers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3067 0F 2005 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1242 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3067 0F 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1242 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.West Coast Containers ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- Delay is less than 200 days. Considering the practical difficulties which the Department was facing including referring the matters to the Law Department, Government of India for drafting the appeal memo and considering the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion, in our opinion, cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. Motion disposed of accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan