In Nma/3085/2011 Of Amish R. Kapadia v. The Income Tax Oficer 12 (3) (2) And Ors, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mlns
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3085 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1084 OF 2011
Amish R. Kapadia
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Income Tax Officer-12(3)(2) & Anr.
..Respondents.
Mr.V. J. Pandit with P.P.Prabhu for the Appellant.Mr. Vinodkumar Chate for the Respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JANUARY, 2012
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion, the delay is
condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue