In Nma/3098/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13,Mumbai v. Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3098 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2193 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax.... Appellant.V/s.
Mrs.Sunita Agarwal.... Respondent.
A.S.Shivsharan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ.DATED : 18[th] October 2010.
P.C.:
In view of disposal appeal, this motion does not survive. Notice of motion is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue