Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3114/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3114/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 7 v. M/S Novartis India Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3114/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 7 v. M/S Novartis India Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/3114/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 7 v. M/S Novartis India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3114 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1644 OF 2007 The CIT-7 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Novartis India Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.A.D.Kango & P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 218 days. From the appeal memo, we find that the issue pertains to allowance of advertising and publicity expenses. The Commissioner (Appeals) held in favour of the assessee. In appeal preferred by revenue, learned Tribunal relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Empire Jute Co. Ltd., reported in 124 ITR 1. 2. In the light of the above, question as framed would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan