Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V-Pune v. Ador Powerton Industries Ltd
High Court
30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V-Pune v. Ador Powerton Industries Ltd
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V-Pune v. Ador Powerton Industries Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3126 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 338 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune.....AppellantV/S.Ador Powerton Industries Ltd, Pune.....Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR &
SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.
30 June 2011.
P.C. :-
1. Heard. None for the respondent, though served.
2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of
Motion, the delay is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
[SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 338 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune.....AppellantV/S.Ador Powerton Industries Ltd, Pune.....Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR &
SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.
30 June 2011.
P.C. :-
1. Not on board. Taken up by consent of Advocate for the appellant.
2. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Lakshmi Machine Works
reported in [2007] 290 ITR 667 (SC), the Counsel for the revenue
seeks to withdraw the Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court-fees as per law.
[SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.