Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V-Pune v. Ador Powerton Industries Ltd

High Court 30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V-Pune v. Ador Powerton Industries Ltd
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/3126/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V-Pune v. Ador Powerton Industries Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3126 OF 2010 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 338 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune.....AppellantV/S.Ador Powerton Industries Ltd, Pune.....Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. 30 June 2011. P.C. :- 1. Heard. None for the respondent, though served. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, the delay is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 338 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune.....AppellantV/S.Ador Powerton Industries Ltd, Pune.....Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. 30 June 2011. P.C. :- 1. Not on board. Taken up by consent of Advocate for the appellant. 2. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Lakshmi Machine Works reported in [2007] 290 ITR 667 (SC), the Counsel for the revenue seeks to withdraw the Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court-fees as per law. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan