Nma/3148/2003 Of The Comissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai-City, Iii,Mumbai v. M/S Scici Limited
High Court
29 Jul 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3148/2003 Of The Comissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai-City, Iii,Mumbai v. M/S Scici Limited
Date of order
29 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3148/2003 Of The Comissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai-City, Iii,Mumbai v. M/S Scici Limited, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
kambli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3148 OF 2003ININTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.939 OF 2003
…
The Commissioner of Income-taxMumbai city-III, Mumbai...Applicantv/s.M/s.SCICI Ltd.Inow merged with M/s.ICICI Ltd.)...Respondent
...Respondent
…
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the applicant.Mr.S.P.Mehta for the respondent.
CORAM:MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SANKLECHA, J.DATE :29 JULY 2013
P.C.
Having heard learned counsel for parties, we condone delay of 89 days in filing Interest Tax Appeal.
2.Notice of motion is, accordingly, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Motion, accordingly, stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue