Nma/3176/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Sbi Capital Marketing Ltd
High Court
23 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3176/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Sbi Capital Marketing Ltd
Date of order
23 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/3176/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Sbi Capital Marketing Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3176/2004 IN IRXA (L) NO.8/2004
(The CIT Mumbai V/s.M/s.SBI Capital Markets Ltd.)
____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦
-randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders
Courts orders or directions¦
and Prothonotary’s orders ¦
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE23rd April, 2008P.C.:
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
: DATE23rd April, 2008
: DATE
: DATE
P.C.:
. Heard Mr.R.Asokan for the Appellant. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 271 days’ delay
caused in filing the Appeal. It appears
that though the Chief Commissioner of Income
Tax had granted approval for filing an
Appeal on 19.1.2004 the Appeal came to be
filed belatedly on 18.10.2004. The reasons
given for delay that of getting the draft
memo of Appeal prepared and administrative
difficulties etc. does not appear to be
justifiable. No sufficient cause is made
out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice
of Motion stands dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, Interest Tax Appeal (L) No.8/2004
also stands dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.