Nma/3219/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Enconium Investment And Finance Ltd
High Court
08 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3219/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Enconium Investment And Finance Ltd
Date of order
08 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/3219/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Enconium Investment And Finance Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
PGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-3v/s.M/s.Econium Investments & Finance Ltd.
....Appellant..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for Appellant.
----
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ.
DATED : 8[th] March 2011
P.C. :
1.Heard.
2.None for the Respondent, though served.
3.For the reasons stated in the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, delay of 121 days is condoned.the Notice of Motion, delay of 121 days is condoned.
4.The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.prayer (a). The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
(SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue