Case LawHigh Court › Nma/32/2018 Of Jaswantlal J Shah v. Assi...

Nma/32/2018 Of Jaswantlal J Shah v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-32

High Court 16 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/32/2018 Of Jaswantlal J Shah v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-32
Date of order
16 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/32/2018 Of Jaswantlal J Shah v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-32, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 31 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2596 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 32 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2595 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 33 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2597 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 34 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2598 OF 2017 Jaswantlal J. Shah .. Applicant In the matter between Jaswantlal J. Shah .. Appellant v/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central,Circle 32, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. Rajeev Kumar for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w Ms. Padma Divakar for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J. P.C. DATED : 16[th] FEBRUARY, 2018. 1.These four Motions seeks condonation of 2 day delay in filing the accompanying appeals from the common order dated 8[th] May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2.We have perused the affidavits in support of the motions and are satisfied that the delay has been sufficiently explained. 3.Accordingly, all the four Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan