Nma/3238/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vii, Mumbai v. Dera Paints And Chemicals Ltd
High Court
23 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3238/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vii, Mumbai v. Dera Paints And Chemicals Ltd
Date of order
23 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/3238/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vii, Mumbai v. Dera Paints And Chemicals Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OFMOTION NO. 3238 OF 2003
NOTICE OF
IN
INCOME TAXAPPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1049 OF 2003
INCOME TAX
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
City-VII, Mumbai. ... Appellant.
V/s.
Dera Paints & Chemicals Ltd. ... Respondent.
Mr S. M. Shah for the appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 23rd April 2007.
DATED : 23rd April 2007.
DATED : 23rd April 2007.
P.C. :----
P.C. :
----
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
None for the respondent though served.
2. Perused affidavit as well as the additional
affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion seeking
condonation of 90 days delay. Sufficient cause is
made out for condoning delay in filing the above
appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or
want of bona fide on the part of the appellant.
Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue