Nma/3241/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Xvi,Mum v. Shri. S.n.ruia
High Court
06 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3241/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Xvi,Mum v. Shri. S.n.ruia
Date of order
06 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3241/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Xvi,Mum v. Shri. S.n.ruia, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NIO.3241 OF 2005WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.1349 OF 2005The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.Shri. S.N.Ruia...Respondent.Mr.B.M.Chatterji, Ms.P.P.Bhosale, and P.S.Sahadevan forthe Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 6TH FEBRUARY,2008.PC :1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs thelearned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Motion alongwith the Appeal. Motion along with Appeal dismissed aswithdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules.Certified copy expedited.
23. The question of law, if any, is kept open for
consideration in appropriate case.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue