In Nma/3285/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii, Mumbai v. S.r.jesrani, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: P.C. :- Since the appeals itself are disposed of, Notice of Motions have become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3285 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3285 OF 2002
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.981 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.981 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.S.R. Jesrani ..Respondent.
ANDIN
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3286 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3286 OF 2002
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.980 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.980 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Mulraj R. Jesrani ..Respondent.
Mr.Parag Vyas i/b. K.B.Rao for appellant in both
matters.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
Since the appeals itself are disposed of,
Notice of Motions have become infructuous. Hence
Notice of Motions stand diposed of accordingly with no
order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue