Nma/3287/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii, Bombay v. C. Jesrani
High Court
19 Sep 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3287/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii, Bombay v. C. Jesrani
Date of order
19 Sep 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/3287/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii, Bombay v. C. Jesrani, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3287 OF 2002
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.983 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-
tax, City XIII, Bombay .. Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.V.C. Jesrani .. Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the
appellant.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :
1. On the motion made by the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant, the notice of motion
moved is allowed to be withdrawn. In the result, the
same is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to
costs.
2. In view of the dismissal of the notice of
motion seeking condonation of delay, the appeal
papers be consigned to record.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue