Nma/3288/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Premier Consolidated
High Court
19 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3288/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Premier Consolidated
Date of order
19 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3288/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Premier Consolidated, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3288 OF 2004
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1329 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-II, Mumbai.
..... Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Premier Consolidated Capital Trust (India) Ltd. ..... Respondent
Mr.R.Ashokan i/b Pankaj Kapoor, Advocates, for the Appellant. Mr.P.K.Parida, Advocates, for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &P.B.MAJMUDAR, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 19, 2008.
P.C.
1.Heard.
2.Considering the cause shown in the affidavit in support of noticeof motion, which reveals sufficient cause for delay of 92 days in filing theappeal, the delay is hereby condoned. Notice of motion is accordinglystands disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a), with no order as to costs.
( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)
( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue