Nma/3290/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City0Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Puran Bansi Holding P. Ltd
High Court
19 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3290/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City0Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Puran Bansi Holding P. Ltd
Date of order
19 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/3290/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City0Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Puran Bansi Holding P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3290 OF 2004
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1330 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-II, Mumbai.
..... Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Puran Bansi Holding P. Ltd.
..... Respondent
Mr.R.Ashokan i/b Pankaj Kapoor, Advocates, for the Appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta i/b S.P.Mehta, Advocates, for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &P.B.MAJMUDAR, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 19, 2008.
P.C.
1.The learned Counsel for the applicant on instructions crave leave
to withdraw the appeal. The notice of motion is accordingly allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)
( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue