Case Law › High Court › Nma/3297/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3297/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 3, Mumbai v. M/S Smita Conductors Ltd. , Mumbai

High Court 05 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Jan 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/3297/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 3, Mumbai v. M/S Smita Conductors Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3297 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2619 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income Tax-IIIAayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road,Mumbai- 400 020....Appellant.Vs.M/s. Smita Conductors Ltd.1402-03, Raheja Centre,Nariman Point, Mumbai....Respondents. Mr. VimalGupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. P.R.Toprani for the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 05th January, 2009. PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condonation for28-days delay in filing the main appeal. For thereasons which are mentioned in the affidavit in supportof the notice of motion, cause shown is found to besufficient cause and therefore, delay in filing theappeal is condoned. Office to number the appeal and list the same for admission in due course. Notice of motion stands disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.