Case Law › High Court › Nma/3314/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3314/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Cygnus Negri Investments Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3314/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Cygnus Negri Investments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3314 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1785 OF 2006 Commissioner of Income-tax-3 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Cygnus Negri Investments P.Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 11.02.2008 PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 775 days delay in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the affidavit in support indicates that the file was sent to the ministry of law for drafting appeal on 23.7.2004 and the draft appeal was received on 5.5.2006. A period of over 1 years for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. The cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1785 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1785 OF 2006 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.