Nma/3328/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. M/S Cadbury India Limited, Mumbai
High Court
16 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3328/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. M/S Cadbury India Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
16 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3328/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. M/S Cadbury India Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3328 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1232 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, City VI
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Cadbury India Limited
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent, though served. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed off accordingly with no order as
to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue