Nma/3329/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Gini Tex. Ltd
High Court
19 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3329/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Gini Tex. Ltd
Date of order
19 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3329/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Gini Tex. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3329 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1422 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3329 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1422 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Gini Tex Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale and P.S.
Shahadevan for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 510 days in preferring
the appeal. From the additional affidavit filed by
Mr.Vivek Verma, Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, we
find that the file was sent to the Law Ministry on
20/5/2004. The order of the I.T.A.T was passed on
16/1/2004. The relevant folder of appeal was handed
over to the designated advocate on 23/6/2004. The
judicial folder along with draft and appeal was
received from the advocate only on 13/7/2005. There is
no explanation whatsoever for the delay from 23/6/2004
to 13/7/2005. In our opinion therefore, the cause
shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence
motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.