Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. Woodland Associates P. Ltd

High Court 01 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. Woodland Associates P. Ltd
Date of order
01 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/3333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. Woodland Associates P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3333 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3333 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1881 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1881 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Woodland Associates Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.R.Ashokan for appellant. Mr.N.M.Porwal for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. The Motion is filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 746 days in filing the above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. The reasons given for condonation of delay in filing the above appeal are totally unsatisfactory. More than 13 months were taken only to obtain court fee stamps. No sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed with no order as to costs. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan