Nma/3349/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhilosa Synthetics Ltd
High Court
01 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3349/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhilosa Synthetics Ltd
Date of order
01 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3349/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhilosa Synthetics Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3349 OF 2006 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3349 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1955 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1955 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Bhilosa Synthetics Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.R.Ashokan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the
affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. The
Notice of Motion is filed seeking condonation of 254
days delay in filing the above appeal. Sufficient
cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no
case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the
part of the appellant. Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal be
numbered.
2. Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.