Nma/3385/2002 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Earnest John And Co.ltd
High Court
04 Oct 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3385/2002 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Earnest John And Co.ltd
Date of order
04 Oct 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/3385/2002 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Earnest John And Co.ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3385 OF 2002IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LDG.) NO. 1009 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant.V/s.M/s.Earnest John & Co. Ltd.
... Respondent.
Parag Vyas for the appellant.Arun Sathe i/b. Desai & Diwanji for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C.DAGAAND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 4th October 2005.
P.C. :----.Heard learned counsel for the parties..No reply or affidavit in opposition has beenfiled to oppose the prayer for condonation of delay.In this view of the matter, considering the absenceof serious contest, the delay is condoned. Officeis directed to register the appeal and place it foradmission.
.Accordingly, motion stands disposed of withno order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue