Case Law › High Court › Nma/3410/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3410/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S Bank Of India , Mumbai

High Court 17 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Jun 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/3410/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S Bank Of India , Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Office objections to be removed within a period of 2 weeks from today, failing which the Appeal to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. [SMT.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3410 OF 2010 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3997 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Mumbai.....AppellantV/S.M/s. Bank of India ....Respondent * * * * Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Subhash S. Shetty, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR, & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. 17 June, 2011. P.C. :- 1. Heard. 2. By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office objections to be removed within a period of 2 weeks from today, failing which the Appeal to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.