Nma/3465/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Ii, Mumbai v. Mazda Packaging L
High Court
26 Sep 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3465/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Ii, Mumbai v. Mazda Packaging L
Date of order
26 Sep 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/3465/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Ii, Mumbai v. Mazda Packaging L, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3465 OF 2002
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1032 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Central II, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mazda Packaging Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao i/b. Mr.G.C. Mishra for the appellant.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :
1. On the motion made by the learned counsel
appearing for the revenue, he is allowed to withdraw
the notice of motion seeking condonation of delay.
2. In view of withdrawal of the notice of
motion seeking condonation of delay, the appeal would
not survive. In that view of the matter it would be
open for the revenue to apply for refund of court fee
as per rules.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue