Nma/3475/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dcw Limited
High Court
05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3475/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dcw Limited
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3475/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dcw Limited, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3475 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1139 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-Tax,..Appellant Mumbai
M/s.DCW Ltd...RespondentMumbai
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for AppellantMr.Jitendra Singh with Mr.K.Gopal, Advocate, forRespondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 395 days in filing of the main appeal.Perusal of the affidavit in support indicates thatthe file was sent to the Ministry of Law fordrafting an appeal memo on 24[th] August, 2004 anddraft was received on or around 2[nd] September, 2005.A period of more than one year for drafting anappeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. Inour view, therefore, the cause shown does not
amount to sufficient cause and hence, the Notice of
Motion stands dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue