Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3539/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3539/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-Ii), Mumbai v. M/S.tips Industries Pvt.ltd

High Court 15 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3539/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-Ii), Mumbai v. M/S.tips Industries Pvt.ltd
Date of order
15 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3539/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-Ii), Mumbai v. M/S.tips Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3539 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.605 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.M/s.Tips Industries Pvt.Ltd...RespondentMr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.Deepak Talashiwala with Mr.V.S.Hadade for theRespondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking thecondonation of 1326 days’ delay in filing the aboveAppeal. Perused the Notice of Motion andAffidavit-in-support thereof.2.It appears, that the Appellant is challengingthe impugned order dated 29th January, 2004 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The ChiefCommissioner of Income Tax had granted approval forfiling an Appeal on 12th July, 2004. However, thepresent Appeal has been lodged on 29th February, 2008i.e. after a lapse of almost four years and sixmonths. The reasons given for causing such a grossdelay are, that of various administrative stepsinvolved which were beyond the control of the Revenue.We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for condoning the delay. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 3.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed. Compliance report, if submitted, would be highly appreciated. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan