Case Law › High Court › Nma/3557/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3557/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Sykesand Ray Equities India Ltd

High Court 16 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Jun 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/3557/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Sykesand Ray Equities India Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3557 OF 2010IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5166 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Sykes Equities (India) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr. Kirit Hakani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). 2.Notice of Motion is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.