Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3565/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3565/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd

High Court 11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3565/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3565/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3565 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1934 OF 2006 Commissioner of Income-tax-III ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Deepak fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd., ..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 11.02.2008 PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 389 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support, we find that the Chief CIT granted approval for filing appeal on 21.9.2005 and thereafter the matter was sent to the Advocate for drafting appeal memo. The draft appeal memo received on 5.9.2006. In our view, the period of almost one year for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. Hence, Notice of Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1934 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1934 OF 2006 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan