Nma/3598/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Mumbai v. M/S. Leena Scottish Lace Private Limited
High Court
11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3598/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Mumbai v. M/S. Leena Scottish Lace Private Limited
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/3598/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Mumbai v. M/S. Leena Scottish Lace Private Limited, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3598 OF 2007IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3598 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2104 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2104 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Leela Scottish Lace Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
None for the respondent, though served. The Motion is
filed for condonation of 524 days delay in filing the
above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support
of the Notice of Motion. The order of I.T.A.T. is
dated 21/10/2005. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
granted approval on 29/3/2006 for filing the appeal.
However, the appeal was filed on 11/9/2007 i.e. after
a lapse of more than 1 year and 4 months. The reasons
given for the delay in filing the appeal is that the
delay is purely due to administrative exigencies and
procedural formalities, which were beyond the control
of the appellant’s office. The reasons given are
totally unsatisfactory. No case is made out for
condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed
with no order as to costs.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.