Nma/3630/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S. Wintech Sytems
High Court
11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3630/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S. Wintech Sytems
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3630/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S. Wintech Sytems, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3630 OF 2007IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3630 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2166 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2166 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Wintech Systems ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. The Motion is
filed for condonation of 684 days delay in filing the
above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support
of the Notice of Motion. The order of I.T.A.T. is
dated 30/5/2005. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
granted approval on 27/10/2005 for filing the appeal.
However, the appeal was filed on 18/9/2007 i.e. after
a lapse of more than one and half years. The reasons
given for the delay in filing the appeal is that the
delay is purely due to administrative difficulties and
want of court fees stamp, which were beyond the control
of the appellant’s office. The reasons given are
totally unsatisfactory. No case is made out for
condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed
with no order as to costs.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.