Nma/3631/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. Vandana Trust
High Court
11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3631/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. Vandana Trust
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3631/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. Vandana Trust, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3631 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2168 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3631 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2168 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Vandana Trust ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Singh for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
In view of the disposal of the appeal,
Notice of Motion has become infructuous and hence
disposed of as such.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue