Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3656/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3656/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S Tulsiani Sumer Associates

High Court 04 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3656/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S Tulsiani Sumer Associates
Date of order
04 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3656/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S Tulsiani Sumer Associates, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: For the purpose ofprocessing the file in order to decide whether anappeal should be filed, the matter remained underconsideration from 11/10/2004 to 20/12/2005 for aperiod of almost 10 months.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3656 OF2006inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2101 of 2006The Commissioner of Income TaxCity 12 Mumbai.. AppellantvsM/s Tulsiani Sumer Associates. .. RespondentsMr.A.S.Rao for AppellantCORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.S.MOHITE, JJDATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007P.C.1. This is a Notice of Motion for condoning 674days delay in filing of the aforesaid Income TaxAppeal. A perusal of the affidavit in support ofthe Notice of Motion it is seen that after approvalwas obtained for filing an appeal, the papers weresent to the panel counsel on 20/12/2005. The memoof appeal was however returned back on 11/5/2006and therefore there is a delay of almost 6 monthsfor drafting the appeal memo. For the purpose ofprocessing the file in order to decide whether anappeal should be filed, the matter remained underconsideration from 11/10/2004 to 20/12/2005 for aperiod of almost 10 months. The delay causedduring the aforesaid two periods is notsatisfactorily explained. In our view, thereforethe cause shown is not sufficient cause. 2. Consequently, Notice of Motion is dismissed.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan