Nma/3658/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City- 9 Mumbai v. M/S. Aditya Constructions And Developers Pvt. Ltd
High Court
16 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3658/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City- 9 Mumbai v. M/S. Aditya Constructions And Developers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3658/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City- 9 Mumbai v. M/S. Aditya Constructions And Developers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3658 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1406 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax-9 )..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Aditya Constructions & )
Developers Pvt. Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s.S.P.Mehta for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 16.02.2009.
PC
1. Considering the cause shown and at the time of dismissal, the respondents were not present, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion made absolute in terms of the prayer clauses. Appeal stands restored to file.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue