Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3666/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3666/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ltu Mumbai v. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd

High Court 17 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3666/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ltu Mumbai v. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd
Date of order
17 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3666/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ltu Mumbai v. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is also dismissed. [SMT.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3666 OF 2010 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6512 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-LTUMumbaiV/S. M/s. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd .....Appellant .....Respondent * * * * Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR, & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. 17 June, 2011. P.C. :- 1. None for the respondent though served. For the reasons stated in the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, the same is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6512 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-LTUMumbaiV/S. M/s. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd .....Appellant .....Respondent * * * * Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR, & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. 17 June, 2011. P.C. :- 1. Not on board. Taken up for admission, at the request of the counsel for the appellant. 2. Counsel for the revenue, fairly states that similar questions raised by the revenue in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal No. 6513 of 2010 (CIT V/s. M/s. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd) has been dismissed. For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is also dismissed. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan