Nma/370/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Wind World Wind Farms (Karnataka) Ltd
High Court
21 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/370/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Wind World Wind Farms (Karnataka) Ltd
Date of order
21 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/370/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Wind World Wind Farms (Karnataka) Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.Office objections, if any, to be removed within four weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* 1/2 * NMA—370-2018 (SR.10)21.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 370 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2944 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-2, Mumbai
….Applicant
(Original Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-2, Mumbai….AppellantV/s.Wind World Wind Farms (Karnataka) Ltd.….Respondent
* * * * *
Ms. Padma Divakar, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-21ST JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.The respondents have been served. Inspite of
the above, none appears to oppose this Notice of Motion.
Rane
* 2/2 * NMA—370-2018 (SR.10)21.6.2018
2.This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of four
days delay in filing the Appeal from the impugned order dated 4th May, 2017 passed by the Tribunal for Assessment Year 2010-11.
3.We have perused the Affidavit dated 21st March, 2018 in support of the Motion and are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4.Office objections, if any, to be removed within four weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue