Nma/374/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Piramal Glass Ltd.(Formerly Known As Gujarat Glass Pvt Ltd)
High Court
07 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/374/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Piramal Glass Ltd.(Formerly Known As Gujarat Glass Pvt Ltd)
Date of order
07 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/374/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Piramal Glass Ltd.(Formerly Known As Gujarat Glass Pvt Ltd), the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Needless to state that, if the office objections are not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
* 1/2 * NMA---374-2018 (SR.14)
Thursday, 7.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 374 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 1911 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax-7
….Applicant
(Original Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax-7 ….AppellantV/s.
Piramal Glass Ltd. (Formerlyknown as Gujarat Glass Pvt.Ltd.)….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-7TH JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.
Mr. Walve, Learned Counsel appearing in
Rane
support of the application, states that the respondents
have been served and he undertakes to file affidavit of service within a week from today.
2. This application seeks condonation of 3 days
delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the order
dated 4th January, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
3.
We have perused the Affidavit of the applicant
in support of the Motion. The delay of 3 days in filing the accompanying Appeal is condoned and four weeks time is granted to remove office objections.
4.
Needless to state that, if the office objections
are not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.