Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3748/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/3748/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Accurate Minerals

High Court 26 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3748/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Accurate Minerals
Date of order
26 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3748/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Accurate Minerals, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3748 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1632 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Accurate Mineral ..Respondent. Mr.R.G. Bhate and P.S. Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Ivor Peter D’cruz for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The order of the I.T.A.T. was received on 9/3/2004. The file was sent to the Ministry of Law on 24/6/2004. Letter for Court fees stamp was written on 28/6/2004. Stamp papers were supplied on 15/11/2005. Appeal was filed on 30/11/2005. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 28/6/2004 and 15/11/2005. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan