Nma/3757/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-12,Mum v. Suresh Thomas
High Court
07 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3757/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-12,Mum v. Suresh Thomas
Date of order
07 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3757/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-12,Mum v. Suresh Thomas, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3757 OF 2007 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3757 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2037 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2037 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Suresh Thomas ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
Ms.Aasifa Khan for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. The Motion is
filed for condonation of 249 days delay in filing the
above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support
of the Notice of Motion. The impugned order is dated
17/8/2006. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
granted approval on 21/12/2006. However, the appeal
was filed only on 6/9/2007. The reasons given for the
delay in filing the appeal is that "I say that the
delay is purely due to administrative exigencies and
procedural formalities etc. which are required to be
complied with by the Department." The reasons given are
totally unsatisfactory. No case is made out for
condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed
with no order as to costs.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.