Nma/3757/2009 Of The Commissi0Ner Of Income-Tax Central-Ii v. M/S.parle Beverages Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
18 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3757/2009 Of The Commissi0Ner Of Income-Tax Central-Ii v. M/S.parle Beverages Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
18 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3757/2009 Of The Commissi0Ner Of Income-Tax Central-Ii v. M/S.parle Beverages Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appellants to remove office objections within a period of two weeks from today, failing which appeal to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3757 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2792 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-IIV/s.M/s.Parle Beverages Ltd., Mumbai----
..... Appellants
..... Respondents
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellants.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE :18/1/ 2011
P.C.
1.Heard.
2For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the Appeal is restored to the file and Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause-(a). Appellants to remove office objections within a period of two weeks from today, failing which appeal to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.