Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune v. Society Of Saint Ursula
High Court
21 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune v. Society Of Saint Ursula
Date of order
21 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune v. Society Of Saint Ursula, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Rane* 1/2 * NMA—376-2018 (SR. 12)
Thursday, 21.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 376 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 636 OF 2018
Commissioner of Income-Tax(Exemption), Pune
….Applicant
(Original Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Commissioner of Income-Tax(Exemption), Pune….Appellant
V/s.Society of Saint Ursula….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-21ST JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.This application seeks condonation of 35 days
delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the
Rane
impugned order dated 23rd August, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal) for Assessment Year 2011-12.
2. We have perused the Affidavit dated 20th
March, 2018 of the applicant in support of the Motion.
We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
3. The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.