Case LawHigh Court › Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune v. Society Of Saint Ursula

High Court 21 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune v. Society Of Saint Ursula
Date of order
21 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/376/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune v. Society Of Saint Ursula, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Rane* 1/2 * NMA—376-2018 (SR. 12) Thursday, 21.6.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 376 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 636 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income-Tax(Exemption), Pune ….Applicant (Original Appellant) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Commissioner of Income-Tax(Exemption), Pune….Appellant V/s.Society of Saint Ursula….Respondent * * * * * Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant. Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :-21ST JUNE, 2018. P.C. :- 1.This application seeks condonation of 35 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the Rane impugned order dated 23rd August, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal) for Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. We have perused the Affidavit dated 20th March, 2018 of the applicant in support of the Motion. We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan