Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd
High Court
27 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd
Date of order
27 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.378 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.235 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax.City - 10, Mumbai....AppellantV/s.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd....Respondent
Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.Mr.A.K. Jasani for the Respondent.
1.There is a delay of 427 days in filing theAppeal. The tax effected, according to the Appellant,is more than Rs.93 crores. The delay was caused onaccount of the file pending in the Ministry of Law. Onthe peculiar facts and, as it is a Central GovernmentOrganization, the matter will have to be examined as towhether the ’Committee of Disputes’ has grantedpermission.
2.In our opinion, considering these aspects, thecause shown would amounts to sufficient cause. Hencethe delay is condoned. Office to register the Appeal.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[F.I. REBELLO, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.