Case LawHigh Court › Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd

High Court 27 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd
Date of order
27 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/378/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.378 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.235 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax.City - 10, Mumbai....AppellantV/s.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd....Respondent Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.Mr.A.K. Jasani for the Respondent. 1.There is a delay of 427 days in filing theAppeal. The tax effected, according to the Appellant,is more than Rs.93 crores. The delay was caused onaccount of the file pending in the Ministry of Law. Onthe peculiar facts and, as it is a Central GovernmentOrganization, the matter will have to be examined as towhether the ’Committee of Disputes’ has grantedpermission. 2.In our opinion, considering these aspects, thecause shown would amounts to sufficient cause. Hencethe delay is condoned. Office to register the Appeal. [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.] [F.I. REBELLO, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan