Nma/3790/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. Jayant J. Shirsat
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3790/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. Jayant J. Shirsat
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3790/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. Jayant J. Shirsat, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3790 OF 2005
ININCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1659 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income tax-18,..Appellant Mumbai
Jayant J. Shirsat..RespondentMumbai
Mr.A.S.Rao, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.A.K.Jasani, Advocate, for Respondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 414 days in filing of the main appeal. Onperusal of the affidavit in support we find thatthe appeal memo duly drafted was received on 5[th]January, 2005 and the appeal was filed on 1[st]December, 2005. There is no explanation for thedelay caused between the aforesaid two periods. Inour view, therefore, the cause shown does notamount to sufficient cause and hence, the Notice of
Motion stands dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue