In Nma/3804/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1,Mumbai v. M/S City Walk Shoes Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3804 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2158 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.City Walk Shoes Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant None
for the respondent. The Motion is filed for
condonation of 635 days delay in filing the above
appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the
Notice of Motion. The impugned order is dated
12/4/2005. The appeal was filed on17/09/2007. The
only reason given for the delay in filing the appeal is
that there was stalement between the Law Ministry and
the Income Tax Department. As a result, the appeal
could not be filed in time. The reason given is
totally unsatisfactory. No case is made out for
condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed
with no order as to costs.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.