Nma/3807/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9, Mumbai v. M/S. Comex Marketing Pvt. Ltd
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3807/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9, Mumbai v. M/S. Comex Marketing Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3807/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9, Mumbai v. M/S. Comex Marketing Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3807 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.2243 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax-9,..Appellant Mumbai
V/s.
M/s.Comex Marketing Pvt. Ltd...RespondentMumbai
Mr.Suraj M. Shah, Advocate, for Appellant None for Respondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 576 days in filing of the main appeal. Onperusal of the affidavit in support we find thatthe CCIT-V approved the filing of the appeal on 22[nd]March, 2005 and the same was filed on 7[th] November,2006. It is not mentioned as to when the file wassent for filing the approval and when it wasreceived. In the circumstances, the delay duringthe period between 22[nd] March, 2005 and 7[th] November,
2006 has not been properly explained. The cause
shown does not amount to sufficient cause and
hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue