Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City 3 v. M/S Reliance Polyepropylene Ltd

High Court 29 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City 3 v. M/S Reliance Polyepropylene Ltd
Date of order
29 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City 3 v. M/S Reliance Polyepropylene Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3808 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL(LODGING) NO.1711 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ...Appellant V/s.M/s.Reliance Polypropylene Ltd ...Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistri with Mr.Raj Darak for Respondent. P.C.:- CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ. DATED : 29[th] APRIL, 2008. 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for theRespondent. By this Notice of Motion, appellant is seeking condonation of 78days delay in filing appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of Notice ofMotion. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no caseof inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Noticeof Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(c). Appeal be numbered. 2.Appeal be listed for hearing in the month of October, 2008 subjectto numbering. 3.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan