Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City 3 v. M/S Reliance Polyepropylene Ltd
High Court
29 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City 3 v. M/S Reliance Polyepropylene Ltd
Date of order
29 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/3808/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai City 3 v. M/S Reliance Polyepropylene Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3808 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL(LODGING) NO.1711 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
...Appellant
V/s.M/s.Reliance Polypropylene Ltd
...Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistri with Mr.Raj Darak for Respondent.
P.C.:-
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.
DATED : 29[th] APRIL, 2008.
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for theRespondent. By this Notice of Motion, appellant is seeking condonation of 78days delay in filing appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of Notice ofMotion. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no caseof inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Noticeof Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(c). Appeal be
numbered.
2.Appeal be listed for hearing in the month of October, 2008 subjectto numbering.
3.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to
costs.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.