Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3851/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3851/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City 03 v. Silvassa Industries Ltd

High Court 11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3851/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City 03 v. Silvassa Industries Ltd
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/3851/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City 03 v. Silvassa Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3851 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1725 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3851 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1725 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Silvassa Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Raj Darak for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. The Motion is filed for condonation of 195 days delay in filing the above appeal. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal be numbered. 2. Appeal be placed for hearing after 3 weeks. 3. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan