Nma/385/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central -2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt Ltd
High Court
22 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/385/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central -2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt Ltd
Date of order
22 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/385/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central -2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 385 OF 2018IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1366 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-2, Mumbai .. Applicant
In the matter betweenThe Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-2, Mumbai .. Appellant
v/s.
Vijay Grihnirman Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent
Ms. Padma Divakar for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 22nd JUNE, 2018.
P.C.
1.Ms. Divakar, learned Counsel for the applicant states that therespondent is served. None appears inspite of service.
2.
This application has been taken out for condonation of 111 days
delay in taking out this motion to set aside the self-operating orderdated 7[th] September, 2017 passed by the Prothonotary and SeniorMaster rejecting the petition for failure to have removed the office
385-18-NM
objections on or before 5[th] October, 2017 under Rule 986 of theBombay High Court (O.S.) Rules.
3.We have perused the additional affidavit of Mr. Girindra PratapSingh, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax dated 18[th] June, 2018 insupport of the motion. We are satisfied with the reasons indicatedtherein.
4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayerclauses (a) and (b).
5.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removedwithin a period of four weeks from today, the appeal shall standsdismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.